You take the middle path and ask about timing, not decisions, because timing is the part you can pretend is neutral. It's the kind of question a cautious analyst might ask to understand how sentiment becomes action, without admitting he's steering the ship with questions. You draft, delete, draft again. You cut anything that sounds like a prod. You cut anything that sounds like flattery. You keep the sentences plain enough to survive suspicion, careful enough to invite an answer. You read it twice before sending, hunting for any word that sounds like hunger. Hunger is what gets you flagged. Hunger is what you feel anyway, thrumming under the politeness. [[Cybercrime/The_Phisherman/Timeline Reply From Isabella|Read the timeline reply from Isabella]]